103°F
weather icon Clear

LETTER: On capitalism, communism and socialism

In John Stossel’s Monday commentary, he continues to look at the world in black and white. Capitalism, he believes, is good, and socialism is bad. He states that 62 percent of young people have a favorable view of socialism, and then asks, “How can they be so ignorant?” He then goes on a rant decrying the evils of life in North Korea, Russia and China. These are not socialist countries. These are communist regimes. Surely, Mr. Stossel knows the difference.

While both political philosophies seek a more equitable society, they certainly approach it differently. Communism aims to abruptly abolish all private property and centralizes production and distribution of wealth. The aim is for a stateless, classless, moneyless society. Theoretically, there is no government because everyone owns everything equally. Tell that to Kim Jong Un or Vladimir Putin, by the way. Socialism aims for a more gradual equitability.

Nordic countries such as Denmark and Sweden have adopted a hybrid model. They use capitalism and the free market to fund social programs such as universal health care and education. Their prison systems focus on rehabilitation and reintegration into society rather than punishment. Perhaps it is this that young people are thinking about when asked about socialism.

Annual happiness surveys always find that people who live in the Nordic countries are the happiest people in the world. Could this be the reason? Maybe it is Mr. Stossel who needs the reality check.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: New Neon section is a winner

Thank you so much for restoring the Neon entertainment section to its formal fullness.

LETTER: Trump had no mandate for Los Angeles raids

Trump thinks winning the election means doing whatever he wants. He and the GOP are purposely exacerbating this, like he always does.

LETTER: Policy-making as a blood sport

Will the United States fall into a totalitarian government that exerts total control, or be a representative democracy that listens to the voices of “we, the people”?

MORE STORIES